Project #154166 - Business Law Case Study II

Law Tutors

Subject Law
Due By (Pacific Time) 11/21/2016 05:00 pm


The following is a case study for Business Law.  You must use the textbook and in text citations. DO NOT BID WITHOUT ACCESS TO THE TEXTBOOK.  Use the Chapters provided below.








Kubasek, N., Browne, M. N., Herron, D. J., Dhooge, L. J., & Barkacs, L. (2016). Dynamic business law: The essentials (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.




 Chapters 2 and 4










 The Ford Pinto case is a well-known case that is often discussed in the context of business ethics. To summarize, Ford's design of the Pinto's fuel tank was defective, causing fires if the Pinto was involved in even minor rear-end collisions. Ford came to learn of the defect, but the company failed to correct it; Ford then predicted, based on a cost-benefit analysis, that it would cost more to repair the defect ($11 per vehicle, or $137 million total) than it would to pay for damages resulting from burn deaths, burn injuries, and burned vehicles ($47.5 million). Consider the Ford Pinto case in light of the who-how (WH) framework for business ethics. 


Would Ford's decision to forego repairing the defective design comply with these ethical guidelines? If so, why? If not, then what actions should Ford have taken to satisfy them? Explain your reasoning. 


Your case study to this question should be a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from outside sources. Use APA format.

Hit all points in the study.




Due Monday November 21, 2016 at 5:00PM Central Standard Time (CST).  Any plagiarism or the use of another student’s paper will result in a dispute which will not be withdrawn for any reason.  These will be filtered through three plagiarism portals to check and verify your work.  I am not paying an inflated price for this.   Please use proper English when writing. 




Hit all points in the Case Study and use the textbook.  You can research outside sources in addition to the textbook but they must be referenced and cited. NO WIKI.  Only scholarly resources can be used.  PLEASE WRITE THIS ON A COLLEGE LEVEL and not PhD or Masters.





out of 1971 reviews

out of 766 reviews

out of 1164 reviews

out of 721 reviews

out of 1600 reviews

out of 770 reviews

out of 766 reviews

out of 680 reviews