Project #156127 - filednotes

General Tutors

Subject General
Due By (Pacific Time) 11/25/2016 11:00 am

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XBb_lEGvXc

 

 

Fieldnotes
Fieldnotes
Criteria Ratings Pts
Setting
The description paints a vivid picture of the place, people, atmosphere, and events. Well done.
7.0 pts
Great job. The description gives a clear picture of the place, atmosphere, and people. Thoughtfully written.
6.0 pts
This description gives a basic description of place, atmosphere, people, and event(s). It leaves out significant information that might later help with analysis and interpretation.
5.0 pts
7.0 pts
Narrative
The narrative provides vivid details of all elements: communication (verbal and non-verbal), dialogue (direct and indirect), interactions (cooperation, conflict, conformity, social exchanges, and coercion), and provides an account of how the observation and/or participation might have led to some understanding of the topic being researched.
7.0 pts
The narrative provides good details of communication, interactions, and behaviors/actions. It's clear the researcher was present, carefully observed, and avoided summarizing events that occurred outside the observation/participation time.
6.0 pts
The narrative provides a basic account of what occurred, indirect dialogue or references, and lists things (actions, behaviors, or communication) that occurred during the observation. It's not clear whether or not the researcher has summarized events that may have taken place outside the observation time.
5.0 pts
7.0 pts
Reflection
Insightful, analytical, and self-reflexive. Provided substantial detail regarding the researcher's bias, interpretation/understanding, and researcher's emerging concepts of the group and topic.
7.0 pts
Self-reflexive and thoughtful. The researcher worked to include information that might have assisted in his or her understanding of the events, people, place, or topic.
6.0 pts
The researcher listed information about him- or her-self that connected to the topic. It took a little effort to deduce how those things may have swayed the researcher's understanding. This information might come more naturally the next time the researcher observes/participates and uses mindful practices to become aware of his or her position.
5.0 pts
7.0 pts
Formatting
Acceptable
4.0 pts
Needs a little work or shows some positive or negative judgement
3.0 pts
Difficult to read/understand or casting too much positive or negative judgement on the group.
2.0 pts
4.0 pts
Total Points: 25.0
 

TutorRating
pallavi

out of 1971 reviews
amosmm

out of 766 reviews
PhyzKyd

out of 1164 reviews
rajdeep77

out of 721 reviews
sctys

out of 1600 reviews
sharadgreen

out of 770 reviews
topnotcher

out of 766 reviews
XXXIAO

out of 680 reviews