|Due By (Pacific Time)||11/30/2016 10:00 pm|
Hello scholars :)
I need you to finish this essay. I will provide you sources, and a basic outline of what i want to be done and expanded. i need around a 1000 words.
Should key events in the historical development of areas of knowledge always be judged by the standards of their time?
- Brainstorm ideas
In each time there are different standards. This is in every area of knowledge that I can think of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, The Arts, Ethics, Religious, Knowledge Systems, Indigenous Knowledge Systems. In each one we can find many experts that their discoveries, advancements and such were not accepted. Einstein, Ramanujan, Basquiat are only some that I can think of from the top of my head, but as I research I will find more examples and analyze them with their respective area of knowledge. I will also talk about things like relativism, standpoint theory and historical revisionism.
- Key definitions
a level of quality or attainment.
"their restaurant offers a high standard of service"
an idea or thing used as a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations.
"the wages are low by today's standards"
- Conlusion - You need to provide some idea of where you want your essay to end up (50 words)
The same as my brainstorm. That yes, key events in the historical development of areas of knowledge should always be judged by the standards of their time. Because we have different social norms, cultural perspectives et.
- at least 5 resources (websites/books/videos/lectures/images...) which will help you answer your essay question. These don't necessarily have to be case studies, but can be like to definitions that might be useful, or a philosopher whose ideas you think will be useful.
- for EACH resource you need to provide a 1Ì¶0Ì¶0Ì¶ Ì¶wÌ¶oÌ¶rÌ¶dÌ¶ 10-20 word rationale for why this is helpful to your question. Make EXPLICIT reference to ideas you have brainstormed and your conclusion. It must be clear you have read and understood the resource.
"How to Structure a Theory of Knowledge Essay." IBMastery. N.p., 9 Sept. 2016. Web. 18 Oct. 2016. A guide of how to structure the essay, formula for each paragraph.
Bohman, James. "Critical Theory." Stanford University. Stanford University, 08 Mar. 2005. Web. 17 Oct. 2016. broad explanation of critical theory, with examples in specific areas of knowledge
Warsh, David. "The Future of the Past." Economic Principals. N.p., 10 Apr. 2016. Web. 17 Oct. 2016. an interesting article of how we view economics advancements of the past
McPherson, James. "Revisionist Historians." Revisionist Historians. N.p., Sept. 2003. Web. 18 Oct. 2016. a article about revisionist historians in the bush administration
"Title 3 - TOK Essay May 2017 KQ 5 : To What Extent the Historical Development in Science Be Judged by Standards of Different Time?" Mindpads. N.p., 2016. Web. 18 Oct. 2016. a direct discussion of the question. facts, evidence are the topics it discusses
out of 1971 reviews
out of 766 reviews
out of 1164 reviews
out of 721 reviews
out of 1600 reviews
out of 770 reviews
out of 766 reviews
out of 680 reviews