|Due By (Pacific Time)||12/05/2016 12:00 am|
Concept of operations: HHS disaster behavioral health (2014). Retrieved from:http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/abc/Documents/dbh-conops-2014.pdf
EM-DAT: The International Disaster Database. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters—CRED. Retrieved from: http://www.emdat.be/
Griffith, C., Trench-It and Vulpitta , R. (2003). Effective emergency response plans, National Safety Council Utilities Division Manager. Retrieved from:http://www.safetyonline.com/article.mvc/Effective-Emergency-Response-Plans-Anticipate-0001
Johnson, T. (2011). Threat of homegrown Islamist terrorism. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from: http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/threat-homegrown-islamist-terrorism/p11509
Kaplan, E. (2009). Terrorists and the internet, Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from: http://www.cfr.org/publication/10005/terrorists_and_the_internet.html
Review of the Department’s preparation to respond to a WMD incident (2010), U.S. Department of Justice, I-2010-004. Retrieved from:http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/plus/e1004.pdf
United States Government interagency domestic terrorism concept of operations plan (2001). Retrieved from: http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/conplan.html [current]
Ziskin,L. and Harris, D. (2007). State health policy for terrorism preparedness. American Journal of Public Health, 97(9), 1583-8. Retrieved from ProQuest
Domestic Terrorism: Wanted by the FBI. http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt
Emergency Planning at the Local Government Level.http://www.mrsc.org/subjects/pubsafe/emergency/em-planning.aspx#About
Emergency preparedness in response to terrorism (2011). U.S.NRC. http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/respond-to-emerg/response-terrorism.html
Emergency support function annexes: Summaries of the ESF annexes, support annexes. DHS:http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-overview.pdf .
FEMA Website. http://www.fema.org/ [Search the FEMA site for background information on different types of emergencies and disasters].
Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies: http://www.ineesite.org/
U.S. Department of Defense Joint Operations Planning and Execution System (2011). Joint Publication 5-0. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp5_0.pdf
What are natural hazards? Organization of American States (n.d.).http://www.oas.org/usde/publications/Unit/oea66e/ch01.htm#a
Partnerships and the Emergency Response Plan
The Session Long Project for this course is to examine partnerships of five essential sectors to an effective Emergency Response Plan (ERP)—using the National Response Framework (NRF) as a guide.
These partnerships are:
We will now consider the first partnership: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and volunteer partnerships.
Respond to the following:
The NRF contains guidelines for NGO and volunteer involvement in the aftermath of a disaster. An effective ERP should have language addressing their involvement locally.
Length: The SLP assignment should be at least 2-3 pages long.
References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required readings are included. The references should be cited within the text and also listed at the end of the assignment in the References section (preferably in APA format).
Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it must be enclosed in quotes.
Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper.
Format: APA format is recommended (but not required) for this assignment. See Syllabus page for more information on APA format.
Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.
The following items will be assessed in particular:
out of 1971 reviews
out of 766 reviews
out of 1164 reviews
out of 721 reviews
out of 1600 reviews
out of 770 reviews
out of 766 reviews
out of 680 reviews