Project #159115 - REVISION TO ESSAY

Philosophy Tutors

Subject Philosophy
Due By (Pacific Time) 12/12/2016 12:00 am

THE ATTACHED PAPER MUST BE REVISED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT BELOW. AN OUTLINE AND GUIDANCE PAPER IS ATTACHED. MOST OF THE INFORMATION IS ALREADY IN THE PAPER.

 

Instructions
 Transform your essay to one that conforms to the requirements below and formatted according to APA style

 

The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

 

  • Introduction
    Your first paragraph should begin with the topic question, suitably revised. It should be focused, concrete, and on a relevant moral problem. You should then introduce the topic in the way described by the Week One instructions, but reflecting the developed understanding and information you have gained about the topic and any necessary refinement of the scope.

    Follow this with a thesis statement that states your position, and a brief description of the primary reason(s) supporting your position. Finally, provide a brief preview of the overall aim and procedure of your paper.

 

 

 

  • Explanation and Demonstration of Moral Reasoning
    This section of the Final Paper will explain and demonstrate what you believe to be the best way of reasoning about the question you have chosen, and showing how that reasoning supports the position you have taken on the question. You might explain the principles, rules, values, virtues, conceptions of purposes and ends, and other general ideas that you find persuasive, and show how they support concrete judgments.

    In the course of doing so, you must make reference to at least two of the approaches that we have examined in the course (such as deontological, utilitarian, or virtue-based), and utilize at least one resource off the provided list for each of the two approaches. One of these theories may be the theory you discussed in your Week Three Assignment, but your discussion here should be more refined.

    For example, you might find the reasoning associated with Aristotelian virtue ethics to be the most compelling, and reference Aristotle in the process of showing how that reasoning supports a certain conclusion. In the course of this, you could contrast that with a utilitarian approach, referencing Mill for instance.

 

 

 

  • Objection and Response
    After explaining the ethical reasoning that supports your position, you should raise an objection and respond to it. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument weak or problematic. You should explain how it brings out this weakness, and do so in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with your own argument. Then, provide the best response you can to the objection, showing how it does not undermine your position. Your response should not simply restate your original position or argument, but should say something new in support of it.

 

 

 

  • Conclusion
    Provide a conclusion that sums up what you presented in the paper and offers some final reflections.

TutorRating
pallavi

out of 1971 reviews
amosmm

out of 766 reviews
PhyzKyd

out of 1164 reviews
rajdeep77

out of 721 reviews
sctys

out of 1600 reviews
sharadgreen

out of 770 reviews
topnotcher

out of 766 reviews
XXXIAO

out of 680 reviews