Project #160831 - Supreme Court Decision Case Study Analysis

Science Tutors

Subject Science
Due By (Pacific Time) 12/17/2016 12:00 am

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is a significant piece of legislation, both in its goal to reform the U.S. health care system and in its sheer size. The law is nearly one thousand pages in length, but those pages boast numerous provisions intended to make health care more accessible to all citizens. Two of the PPACA provisions were challenged as soon as the law was passed:

  • Individual mandate: Individuals must possess a minimum level of health insurance or face financial penalties.
  • Increased access to Medicaid: Individuals earning less than 133% of the poverty-level baseline are eligible for Medicaid.

Florida and 11 other states challenged these provisions as unconstitutional in the case National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. In this assignment, you evaluate the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the constitutionality of the PPACA in this specific court case. 

The assignment (2–3 pages)

In your evaluation of the ruling, be sure to include the following elements:

  • An explanation of the Supreme Court’s position regarding the duties and responsibilities of health agencies to protect the public’s health and safety.
  • A critique of the court’s position from a public health, legal, and ethical perspective


you can also use these sources and also you can got the supreme court website



out of 1971 reviews

out of 766 reviews

out of 1164 reviews

out of 721 reviews

out of 1600 reviews

out of 770 reviews

out of 766 reviews

out of 680 reviews